Debate intensifies over social media restrictions for children

(MENAFN) As governments increasingly consider limiting children’s access to social media, the debate over how best to protect young users is gaining momentum. Proposals range from higher age limits to outright bans, fueled by growing concern about the effects of constant online connectivity on children’s mental health, learning, and overall well-being.

Recent studies show that 97% of young people go online daily, with 78% checking their devices at least once an hour. About one in four minors exhibits what researchers describe as “problematic” or “dysfunctional” smartphone use, with patterns akin to addiction. Experts warn that overuse can reduce concentration in class and hinder real-world communication skills.

UNICEF has welcomed increased attention to online safety but stresses that restrictive measures must be carefully balanced. Aaron Greenberg, UNICEF regional adviser for child protection in Europe and Central Asia, said limiting social media can sometimes help children focus and learn more effectively. Yet, he noted, platforms are designed to be highly engaging, affecting some children more than others.

“UNICEF frequently hears from educators, families, and students themselves about how many young people struggle to put their phone down to study, pay attention in class, or get a proper night’s sleep,” Greenberg said.

Public concern is widespread. The 2025 Eurobarometer found that over 90% of Europeans see urgent action as necessary to protect children online, and 93% believe social media negatively affects children’s mental health.

However, Greenberg cautioned that age restrictions can allow platforms to evade responsibility, push children into unregulated spaces, and reduce their digital literacy. “If children aren't supposed to be there, why should companies invest in making their services safer or more educational for them?” he asked. He added that bans could also cut children off from important sources of information and support.

UNICEF suggests that managing smartphone and social media use in classrooms can be an effective strategy, especially when students are involved in the discussion. Limiting social media may encourage the development of face-to-face communication skills, but digital spaces remain a major venue for interaction, making digital safety education essential.

“A social media ban can undermine children’s rights, isolate marginalized groups, and silence young voices,” Greenberg warned. He emphasized that policies must allow children to learn, play, and grow while safeguarding their online experience, and should be designed with children’s input.

The push for stricter rules is growing. In late November, the European Parliament proposed banning social media for children under 16 unless parents consent, citing serious health risks.

The move follows Australia’s pioneering ban for minors under 16 to shield them from cyberbullying, harmful content, grooming, and predatory behavior. Several European nations, including Norway, Denmark, Ireland, Spain, and France, are also advancing similar regulations.

Greenberg stressed that UNICEF supports governments’ efforts but urges that age restrictions be coupled with platform accountability, strong privacy safeguards, and careful monitoring of real-world impacts on children.

MENAFN24122025000045017640ID1110520286